Skip to main content

Help save open space in the Bay Area by protecting Knowland Park from development

Vote NO on new Tax Measure A1

Update: there is now evidence that Zoo officials have actually violated election laws in their zeal to promote measure A1.

I normally only blog about technical topics, but the destruction of a beautiful piece of open space in the Bay Area is imminent, and I want to at least do a little bit to help prevent this disaster.

In short: there's a tax measure on the November ballot, Measure A1, that would impose a parcel tax on all residences and businesses in Alameda County to fund the Oakland Zoo for the next 25 years.  The way the short text on the ballot is worded makes it appear as something geared towards animal care for a cash-strapped Zoo.  The sad reality is that the full text of the measure allows the Zoo to use these funds for a very controversial expansion plan that includes a 34,000 sq. ft. visitor center, gift shop and restaurant serviced by a ski gondola atop one of the last pristine remaining ridges in Knowland Park, an Oakland city park that sits above the Zoo.

Yes, it's as bad as it sounds; the beautiful ridge in the background:


that is today part of an unspoiled open space, would be closed off by a fence and a restaurant would be built atop of it,  serviced by a ski gondola that would reach it from the bottom of the hill.  Here are a few more pics from the same album as well as a great photo essay on the park from the AllThingsOakland blog, and some more history of the park.

Restaurant development disguised as animal care


The Zoo claims to be strapped for cash, yet they are spending over $ 1 million on a media blitz to get this measure passed, and only presenting it as an animal-care issue.  I am a huge animal lover and donate regularly to the San Diego Zoo, but unfortunately the situation with the Oakland Zoo is a different story: they see the 525-acre Knowland Park above the Zoo as their personal back yard, not as a resource that belongs to all of us.  It has been impossible, in years of negotiations, to get the Zoo to sign anything that commits them to respect the boundaries of the park in the future.  They see this tax measure as their strategic "nuclear weapon" to destroy the park, and in order to get it, they are willing to burn through cash they should instead be using for animal care.

I urge you to consider this as you go to the polls in November: all Alameda county voters will end up having a say on whether "nature preservation" in the East Bay is spelled "huge restaurant and a ski gondola on open space". By voting NO on A1 you will help prevent such madness.



More information

 Here are a few relevant links with details and further info

A final note: the citizen's group fighting to save the park can use all the help in the world. You can make donations or join the effort in many other ways; don't hesitate to ask me for more info.  And please share this post as widely as possible!

Comments

Julia said…
Thanks for your post. It is a tragedy to destroy rare native habitat to keep animals in captivity, in exhibits, and to build a gondola ride.
Fernando Perez said…
Indeed, and now that we see that the Zoo executives are even willing to break the law to ram A1 through, it's clear that they are not the right stewards of our resources.
Michael Sarahan said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Michael Sarahan said…
Thanks for clarifying this. I read up on it on smartvoter.org, and found the support seriously suspect.

Mike Sarahan here, not sure why my name is "unknown"
Fernando Perez said…
Hi Mike, thanks for looking into it! I'm a huge animal lover and would love to play an active role in supporting the zoo's mission of animal care. But it will have to be when they manage things in a way that is fiscally responsible, financially transparent and environmentally sensible. Their current tactics are pretty much 'none of the above'.

Popular posts from this blog

The IPython notebook: a historical retrospective

On December 21 2011, we released IPython 0.12 after an intense 4 1/2 months of development.  Along with a number of new features and bug fixes, the main highlight of this release is our new browser-based interactive notebook : an environment that retains all the features of the familiar console-based IPython but provides a cell-based execution workflow and can contain not only code but any element a modern browser can display.  This means you can create interactive computational documents that contain explanatory text (including LaTeX equations rendered in-browser via MathJax), results of computations, figures, video and more.  These documents are stored in a version-control-friendly JSON format that is easy to export as a pure Python script, reStructuredText, LaTeX or HTML. For the IPython project this was a major milestone, as we had wanted for years to have such a system, and it has generated a fair amount of interest online. In particular, on our mailing list a us...

Blogging with the IPython notebook

Update (May 2014): Please note that these instructions are outdated. while it is still possible (and in fact easier) to blog with the Notebook, the exact process has changed now that IPython has an official conversion framework. However, Blogger isn't the ideal platform for that (though it can be made to work). If you are interested in using the Notebook as a tool for technical blogging, I recommend looking at Jake van der Plas' Pelican support or Damián Avila's support in Nikola . Update: made full github repo for blog-as-notebooks, and updated instructions on how to more easily configure everything and use the newest nbconvert for a more streamlined workflow. Since the notebook was introduced with IPython 0.12 , it has proved to be very popular, and we are seeing great adoption of the tool and the underlying file format in research and education. One persistent question we've had since the beginning (even prior to its official release) was whether it would...

An ambitious experiment in Data Science takes off: a biased, Open Source view from Berkeley

Today, during a White House OSTP event combining government, academia and industry, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation announced a $37.8M funding commitment to build new data science environments. This caps a year's worth of hard work for us at Berkeley, and even more for the Moore and Sloan teams, led by Vicki Chandler , Chris Mentzel and Josh Greenberg : they ran a very thorough selection process to choose three universities to participate in this effort. The Berkeley team was led by Saul Perlmutter , and we are now thrilled to join forces with teams at the University of Washington and NYU, respectively led by Ed Lazowska and Yann LeCun . We have worked very hard on this in private, so it's great to finally be able to publicly discuss what this ambitious effort is all about. Most of the UC Berkeley BIDS team, from left to right: Josh Bloom, Cathryn Carson, Jas Sekhon, Saul Perlmutter, Erik Mitchell, Kimmen Sjölander, Jim Sethia...